Kate Anthony

OTI Europe Ltd | Consultancy, Personal Training and Research for Online Therapeutic Services

   
  • Home
  • About
    • CV
  • Speaker
  • Consult/Supervision
  • Online Therapy Training
  • CPD Specials
  • Coach Courses
  • Work with Young People?
  • COVID 19 Telehealth course
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Work with DV?

Omnichannelled Therapy – the Future of the Profession

July 24, 2015 by Kate Anthony

ForeSee-Omnichannel-Customer-ExperienceFor a while now when describing the rise of using technology to deliver therapeutic services, I’ve found it helpful to include traditional ways of how we work within the definition.  This was helped immensely by taking the writing of my hero Douglas Adams into account, and particular his thoughts on technology itself in his seminal 1999 article “How to Stop Worrying and Learn to Love the Internet”:

“We no longer think of chairs as technology, we just think of them as chairs. But there was a time when we hadn’t worked out how many legs chairs should have, how tall they should be, and they would often ‘crash’ when we tried to use them.“

It could be argued that chairs themselves are a necessity of being a therapist – I’m pretty confident in saying we all use them when communicating with clients. So in considering this traditional way of conducting a therapeutic session, we can include face-to-face work as a technology as well. Adams published that article at around the same time that I joined forces with the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy to develop the early Guidelines for Online Counselling and Psychotherapy, the backbone of the ethical advice and competencies for online practitioners we have today, and so I think the time is ripe for us to move on as a profession after over 15 years.

I just did a podcast with the lovely people over at counsellorcpd.com (available early September, check back for the link), and it started me thinking again about how we talk about online therapy as a whole. I described during the podcast how only last year I yet again had the debate about what to call services delivered over the Internet – is it e-therapy, is it teletherapy, is it online therapy…?

Well, how about we take the technology out of the description and just go back to not thinking about that too much? How about we go back to the core of what we do – two or more human beings working together with therapeutic intention to improve someone’s mental health and ability to deal with life’s challenges?

How about we just call it, er, therapy?

So I want us to look at this in a new way, taking into account all the many avenues of communication we have available to us now – be that face-to-face, telephone, email, chat, video, virtual environments or smoke signals.  It’s a therapeutic interaction, a relationship, two or more people talking intentionally. It really as simple as it’s always been – we just need to recognise that if we take away the need to think about the screens and keyboards and plugs and chargers and on-buttons and pretty flashing lights, we’re left with the therapeutic relationship itself.

We can offer this relationship in a myriad of ways now, and we can be less restrained by factors such as place or time. The client can choose how and when they want to work, and the practitioner can choose how and when to offer their services.  Want to work for 50 minutes in a room with two chairs and a box of tissues? Fine! Want to pick up a telephone and call a helpline spontaneously? Also fine! Want to reach out to your therapist via instant message but not book an entire session? Very fine! Want to journey through a virtual world as an avatar on an epic journey with your counsellor, seeking self-enlightenment? Awesome! That’s just omnichannelling, a word already widely used by marketers looking to improve their customer experience (thanks to ForeSee for the image I borrowed btw).

So I’m going to move further away from the distinction of the offline and the online, take away the need to define therapy by how we deliver it rather than what it is we are actually doing, and if we really need to call it something to remind us we’re not necessarily physically in a room anymore (but it’s OK if we are!), just call it omnichannelled therapy.

I like to think Douglas Adams would be proud of me.

🙂

Trolls .v. Abusers – Let’s Clarify a Bit

October 19, 2014 by Kate Anthony

I’ve posted about trolling before when I returned from a conference – and feel inspired to do so again having returned from another!  I went to a colleague’s workshop on CyberTrauma recently, and spent a very enjoyable day with counsellors, teachers, and other people with an interest in e-safety when it comes to working with children.  One of the most interesting debates was around trolling, and how this can be misunderstood in the context of the Internet as a result of media attention that aims to highlight the negative behaviours online that we encounter.

Here’s how I see it: it’s all down to the intention of the poster.

Cyberbullying is not trolling. Nor are flames or flamewars. Nor is downright online abuse of another human being or beings online when done anonymously through a public forum such as Twitter.  I do feel that the recent legal moves towards prosecution of those who engage in online abuse is a good thing, as I do feel that this addresses the incongruent gap between what is “real” abuse and what is “unreal” (as in: “it’s virtual so it doesn’t exist” – a phrase that has haunted my career when looking at the validity of online relationships, and which inspired one of my favourite self-penned articles back in 2001).

But trolling itself need not be abusive. It certainly can be irritating, frustrating, annoying, and create hours of time spent moderating forum posts, tweets, and blog comments when time could be better spent on something else. And it is true to say that it can often be abusive in nature and appear insulting (at best). But while trolling can be abusive, that does not mean that that is the central aim of trolling behaviour. The central aim of trolling is to lead the audience away from the intention of the initial poster.  It’s a smoke and mirrors exercise to draw attention to a new topic – one that is seemingly related but in effect creates a different conversation, ensuring the original point-of-vibluehaired_trollew is lost.  Take away the insults, threats, verbal abuse and (usually) bad spelling/use of caps and what you can see is an artform.  Done well, trolling is actually quite clever.  And a lot of the time, it’s actually quite funny (remember Rickrolling? That’s a classic example of trolling).

There are plenty of lists of the top examples of trolling over the last 25 years online, and plenty of articles discussing it (here’s a good simple one from Urban75).  I’m finding that within my work conversations it’s getting increasingly hard to distinguish between good old trolling and internet abuse, and that makes life difficult when training and offering informed opinion about how society could or should treats trolls, particularly within the field of mental health.

In the past few years the phrase “don’t feed the trolls” became a meme in itself – and when re-dressed as “don’t feed the online abusers” it makes perfect sense (although that attitude has changed in light of online abuse being (rightly) taken as a criminal matter rather than simply an annoyance).

But let’s be clearer in our definitions of what is trolling and what is online abuse – it’s going to make addressing mental health issues caused or exacerbated by types of online behaviour WAY easier.

🙂

Lost?

Are you looking for counselling?...
Online or Offline

If you are in immediate distress or you feel suicidal and are in the UK then please visit the Samaritans.

In other countries, please contact Befrienders International.

Connect with Kate

Tweets

Tweets by @KateAnthony
© 2020 Online Therapy Institute Europe Ltd